This project follows a concrete 2D Fermi-Hubbard simulation route: from the earlier 1D IBM/TDVP validation series, through a cuprate-oriented square-lattice Hubbard model, to exact 3×3 validation, IBM and Fire Opal diagnostics, and tensor-network baselines up to the current 6×6 diagnostic step.
The claim boundary is practical and cautious. The current 2D results are diagnostic validation data. They are not a claim of d-wave superconductivity, not material evidence for cuprates, and not a quantum-advantage claim.
Article series
- Part 1: from 1D to 2D
- Part 2: 2D Hubbard, cuprates, and Google/Willow context
- Part 3: our 3×3 implementation
- Part 4: time evolution and hardware diagnostics
- Part 5: 4×4 hardware and tensor baselines
- Part 6: 6×6 tensor baseline, IBM diagnostics, and Fire Opal Fez


