Edukaizen

Menu
  • Nieuws
  • Hubbard 1D
    • Part 1: 1D Hubbard model
    • Part 2: Snake layout and fSWAP
    • Part 3: Qiskit and Fire Opal
    • Part 4: 120-qubit run
    • Part 5: Time-to-answer
    • Part 6: Tensor networks
    • Part 7: Majorana propagation
    • Part 8: Heatmaps
    • Part 9: 2D Hubbard outlook
    • Part 10: Quantum computer as a lab
    • Part 11: Official Monoprop benchmark
  • Hubbard 2D
    • Part 1: 1D to 2D
    • Part 2: Cuprates
    • Part 3: 3×3
    • Part 4: Time
    • Part 5: 4×4
    • Part 6: 6×6 Fez
  • Hadron
    • Deel 1: Hadron op quantumprocessor
    • Deel 2: Quarks en confinement
    • Deel 3: SU(2) en LSH
    • Deel 4: Hamiltoniaan en circuit
    • Deel 5: Fire Opal
    • Deel 6: Klassieke simulaties
    • Deel 7: Quantumvoordeel
  • Black Hole OLE
    • Part 1: What we ran
    • Part 2: How OLE works
    • Part 3: Fire Opal and Kingston
    • Part 4: The tensor-network challenge
    • Part 5: Hawking and scrambling
    • Part 6: What the result proves
    • Part 7: Local toy model
    • Part 8: QGSS26 compatibility
  • Random Graph
    • Start here
    • Part 1: Theory
    • Part 2: Circuit
    • Part 3: Qiskit
    • Part 4: Complexity
    • Part 5: Verification
    • Part 6: Workflow
    • Part 7: Conclusion
  • QOS QML
    • Nederlands
    • English
    • Beginnershandleiding 4q
  • Floquet-Ising
    • Part 1: Floquet physics
    • Part 2: Ising cycle
    • Part 3: Two-qubit toy model
    • Part 4: Oscillation and entanglement
    • Part 5: Noise and error mitigation
    • Part 6: Toward 51 qubits
  • Quantumgoud
    • Deel 1: Waarom goud een relativistisch quantumprobleem is
    • Deel 2: Waarom het goud-VQE-onderzoek uit 2025 vastliep
    • Deel 3: Van QE en spin-baan-koppeling naar Qiskit
    • Deel 4: Twaalf goud-spinormodi op vier qubits
    • Deel 5: De 24-qubit route: een actief venster voor transport
    • Deel 6: 24 qubits op IBM en met Fire Opal
    • Deel 7: De route naar quantumvoordeel voor goud
  • Advantage List
Menu

The road to quantum advantage for gold

NederlandsEnglish

Part 7 · research roadmap

Quantum advantage for gold requires more than a large qubit count or a completed hardware job. Quantum and classical routes must solve the same physical task at the same accuracy under an honest timing protocol.

The active-space ladder

Width Role Status
4 qubits Exact one-hole reduction of 12 material-derived spinor modes Executed on hardware; classically easy.
24 qubits Four-site interacting transport control model Exact/observable validation and hardware execution; still Au-inspired.
48 qubits Complete 5d+6s space on four Au sites Resource candidate; Wannier labels, matrix elements and interactions remain to be frozen.
56 qubits 5d+6s plus an effective 6p optical band Recommended candidate; the present shallow circuit proxy still uses synthetic coefficients.
60 qubits Larger effective transport benchmark or five-site 5d+6s model The generic route was too deep: depth 3108 and 4944 CZ gates in the best attempt.
72 qubits Complete local 5d+6s+6p optical space Long-term target, not a hardware claim.

When may we say “advantage”?

  1. Freeze one complete task, such as a spectral or transport observable with a stated error tolerance.
  2. Import the material Hamiltonian, dipoles and screened interactions without fitting the colour.
  3. Show an overlap regime in which quantum and the strongest classical methods agree.
  4. Measure QPU active time, shots, compilation, mitigation and failed attempts under one protocol.
  5. Compare against symmetry-aware exact methods, Krylov methods, tensor networks and particle-hole methods.
  6. Only then scale beyond the classical range while retaining an internal verification strategy.

The present conclusion

The 24-qubit results demonstrate technical feasibility and a useful mitigation comparison. They do not demonstrate quantum advantage. A possible first boundary lies around 48–60 qubits, but “possible” is neither an extrapolation nor a claim. The 56-qubit route is physically more interesting because it adds an explicit optical channel, while the 60-qubit routing test shows why qubit count without depth control means little.

Outlook: the value of this roadmap is that the next step is falsifiable. A material-derived 48/56-qubit Hamiltonian must first pass small classical overlap tests and hardware-routing gates. Failure to pass them would also be a scientific result.
Claim boundary. Quantum advantage for gold has not been realised. The current evidence defines a credible route and the experiments required to justify—or reject—such a claim later.
Project page: Relativistic gold

  1. Part 1: Why gold is a relativistic quantum problem
  2. Part 2: Why the 2025 gold VQE study stalled
  3. Part 3: From QE and spin–orbit coupling to Qiskit
  4. Part 4: Twelve gold spinor modes on four qubits
  5. Part 5: The 24-qubit route: an active window for transport
  6. Part 6: 24 qubits on IBM and with Fire Opal
  7. Part 7: The road to quantum advantage for gold

Sources and reproducibility

  • Feynman (1982), simulating physics with computers
  • Wannier90 methodology
  • IBM Qiskit: PauliEvolutionGate

Project status: 8 August 2026. Numerical values come from the frozen local research artifacts; the original claim boundaries are deliberately preserved.

Recent Posts

  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 8 augustus 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 7 augustus 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 6 augustus 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 5 augustus 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 4 augustus 2026

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • May 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • September 2024

Categories

  • 10
  • Quantum Computing
  • Uncategorized
©2026 Edukaizen | Theme by SuperbThemes