Edukaizen

Menu
  • News
  • Hubbard
    • Hubbard 1D
      • Part 1: 1D Hubbard model
      • Part 2: Snake layout and fSWAP
      • Part 3: Qiskit and Fire Opal
      • Part 4: 120-qubit run
      • Part 5: Time-to-answer
      • Part 6: Tensor networks
      • Part 7: Majorana propagation
      • Part 8: Reading heatmaps
      • Part 9: Digital vs cold-atom labs
      • Part 10: Official Monoprop benchmark
    • Hubbard 2D
      • Part 1: 1D to 2D
      • Part 2: Cuprates
      • Part 3: 3×3
      • Part 4: Time
      • Part 5: 4×4
      • Part 6: 6×6 Fez
    • 2D Local Quantum Advantage
      • Deel 1: Doel en budget
      • Deel 2: Fermionmodel
      • Deel 3: Mapping en diepte
      • Deel 4: Pilots en shots
      • Deel 5: Foutmitigatie
      • Deel 6: 6×6-resultaten
      • Deel 7: Circa 20x
      • Deel 8: Google en Bonsai
      • Deel 9: Volgende stap
  • Hadron
    • Part 1: Hadron on a quantum processor
    • Part 2: Quarks and confinement
    • Part 3: SU(2) and LSH
    • Part 4: Hamiltonian and circuit
    • Part 5: Fire Opal
    • Part 6: Classical simulations
    • Part 7: Quantum advantage
  • Black Hole OLE
    • Part 1: What we ran
    • Part 2: How OLE works
    • Part 3: Fire Opal and Kingston
    • Part 4: The tensor-network challenge
    • Part 5: Hawking and scrambling
    • Part 6: What the result proves
    • Part 7: Local toy model
    • Part 8: QGSS26 compatibility
  • Random Graph
    • Start here
    • Part 1: Theory
    • Part 2: Circuit
    • Part 3: Qiskit
    • Part 4: Complexity
    • Part 5: Verification
    • Part 6: Workflow
    • Part 7: Conclusion
  • Floquet-Ising
    • Part 1: Floquet physics
    • Part 2: Ising cycle
    • Part 3: Two-qubit toy model
    • Part 4: Oscillation and entanglement
    • Part 5: Noise and error mitigation
    • Part 6: Toward 51 qubits
  • XXZham
    • Part 1: The XXZ model and imbalance
    • Part 2: From dynamics to a quantum circuit
    • Part 3: The classical simulation methods
    • Part 4: Error mitigation on real hardware
    • Part 5: Results and the classical comparison
    • Part 6: Original study and next steps
  • Nighthawk RCS 61q
    • Part 1: The paper
    • Part 2: Our IBM measurements
    • Part 3: MPS and advantage
    • Part 4: RCS theory and applications
  • Work
    • QOS QML
      • Tutorial: UMI counts to a four-qubit circuit
      • Part 1: The QML task
      • Part 2: QOS theory
      • Part 3: Gene expression to 40 qubits
      • Part 4: JAX to hardware
      • Part 5: Readout and classifier
      • Part 6: 40-qubit result
      • Part 7: Route to quantum advantage
      • Part 8: 60-qubit result
    • Quantum Gold
      • Part 1: Why gold is a relativistic quantum problem
      • Part 2: Why the 2025 gold VQE study stalled
      • Part 3: From QE and spin–orbit coupling to Qiskit
      • Part 4: Twelve gold spinor modes on four qubits
      • Part 5: The 24-qubit route: an active window for transport
      • Part 6: 24 qubits on IBM and with Fire Opal
      • Part 7: The road to quantum advantage for gold
      • Part 8: 24 gold spinor modes on IBM with ZNE-PEA
      • Part 9: Forced gold colour on 56 qubits
    • HaPPY Gravity
      • Part 1: Gravity as a phase gate
      • Part 2: Bosons and convergence
      • Part 3: The dynamic HaPPY benchmark
      • Part 4: The N=145 classical audit
      • Part 5: MPS and Majorana baselines
      • Part 6: PEA/ZNE and the decisive test
    • Fibonacci Anyons
      • Part 1: Fusion and braiding
      • Part 2: The 3/5/9-qubit ladder
      • Part 3: Why nine qubits were too deep
      • Part 4: Structure-aware simplification
      • Part 5: IBM hardware diagnostic
      • Part 6: Results and open questions
  • Advantage List
  • Contact
Menu

Category: Quantum Computing

Quantum computing-nieuws — 14 augustus 2026

Posted on August 14, 2026August 14, 2026 by

Dagelijkse selectie van quantumcomputingnieuws voor 14 augustus 2026.

IBM Quantum queues surge past 264,000 pending jobs

Posted on August 13, 2026 by

A live Qiskit Runtime check found 264,220 pending jobs across IBM Fez, Kingston and Marrakesh. The queue surge is verified, but its cause is not yet established.

Black Hole OLE, part 5: Hawking, black holes, and scrambling

Posted on July 11, 2026July 20, 2026 by admin

A reproducible Q80 Operator Loschmidt Echo study, from circuit construction and hardware execution to tensor-network limits and information scrambling.

Black Hole OLE, part 6: what the result proves and what comes next

Posted on July 11, 2026August 9, 2026 by admin

A reproducible Q80 Operator Loschmidt Echo study, from circuit construction and hardware execution to tensor-network limits and information scrambling.

Black Hole OLE, part 4: the tensor-network challenge

Posted on July 11, 2026July 20, 2026 by admin

A reproducible Q80 Operator Loschmidt Echo study, from circuit construction and hardware execution to tensor-network limits and information scrambling.

Black Hole OLE, part 3: Fire Opal on IBM Kingston

Posted on July 11, 2026July 20, 2026 by admin

A reproducible Q80 Operator Loschmidt Echo study, from circuit construction and hardware execution to tensor-network limits and information scrambling.

Black Hole OLE, part 1: what we actually ran

Posted on July 11, 2026August 9, 2026 by admin

A reproducible Q80 Operator Loschmidt Echo study, from circuit construction and hardware execution to tensor-network limits and information scrambling.

Black Hole OLE, part 2: how an Operator Loschmidt Echo works

Posted on July 11, 2026August 9, 2026 by admin

A reproducible Q80 Operator Loschmidt Echo study, from circuit construction and hardware execution to tensor-network limits and information scrambling.

Fermi-Hubbard 2D cuprate series, part 6: 6×6 tensor baseline, IBM diagnostics, and Fire Opal Fez

Posted on July 4, 2026 by

The 6×6 step reaches 72 qubits, but the current hardware result is still diagnostic: Fire Opal Fez improves strongly over IBM, while sector survival remains low.

Fermi-Hubbard 2D cuprate series, part 5: 4×4 hardware and tensor baselines

Posted on July 4, 2026 by

The 4×4 run is where exact ED stops being the comfortable reference route and tensor baselines become necessary.

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next

Recent Posts

  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 2 oktober 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 25 september 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 18 september 2026
  • A Call to Qiskit Advocates: Help Test Quantum Advantage
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 11 september 2026

Recent Comments

  1. XXZham: simulating 80 spins with a NISQ quantum computer - Edukaizen on XXZham: quantumsimulatie van 80 spins

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • May 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • September 2024

Categories

  • 10
  • Quantum Computing
  • Uncategorized
©2026 Edukaizen | Theme by SuperbThemes