Edukaizen

Menu
  • Nieuws
  • Hubbard 1D
    • Part 1: 1D Hubbard model
    • Part 2: Snake layout and fSWAP
    • Part 3: Qiskit and Fire Opal
    • Part 4: 120-qubit run
    • Part 5: Time-to-answer
    • Part 6: Tensor networks
    • Part 7: Majorana propagation
    • Part 8: Heatmaps
    • Part 9: 2D Hubbard outlook
    • Part 10: Quantum computer as a lab
    • Part 11: Official Monoprop benchmark
  • Hubbard 2D
    • Part 1: 1D to 2D
    • Part 2: Cuprates
    • Part 3: 3×3
    • Part 4: Time
    • Part 5: 4×4
    • Part 6: 6×6 Fez
  • Hadron
    • Deel 1: Hadron op quantumprocessor
    • Deel 2: Quarks en confinement
    • Deel 3: SU(2) en LSH
    • Deel 4: Hamiltoniaan en circuit
    • Deel 5: Fire Opal
    • Deel 6: Klassieke simulaties
    • Deel 7: Quantumvoordeel
  • Black Hole OLE
    • Part 1: What we ran
    • Part 2: How OLE works
    • Part 3: Fire Opal and Kingston
    • Part 4: The tensor-network challenge
    • Part 5: Hawking and scrambling
    • Part 6: What the result proves
    • Part 7: Local toy model
    • Part 8: QGSS26 compatibility
  • Random Graph
    • Start here
    • Part 1: Theory
    • Part 2: Circuit
    • Part 3: Qiskit
    • Part 4: Complexity
    • Part 5: Verification
    • Part 6: Workflow
    • Part 7: Conclusion
  • QOS QML
    • Nederlands
    • English
    • Beginnershandleiding 4q
  • Floquet-Ising
    • Part 1: Floquet physics
    • Part 2: Ising cycle
    • Part 3: Two-qubit toy model
    • Part 4: Oscillation and entanglement
    • Part 5: Noise and error mitigation
    • Part 6: Toward 51 qubits
  • Quantumgoud
    • Deel 1: Waarom goud een relativistisch quantumprobleem is
    • Deel 2: Waarom het goud-VQE-onderzoek uit 2025 vastliep
    • Deel 3: Van QE en spin-baan-koppeling naar Qiskit
    • Deel 4: Twaalf goud-spinormodi op vier qubits
    • Deel 5: De 24-qubit route: een actief venster voor transport
    • Deel 6: 24 qubits op IBM en met Fire Opal
    • Deel 7: De route naar quantumvoordeel voor goud
  • Advantage List
Menu

Why the 2025 gold VQE study stalled

NederlandsEnglish

Part 2 · literature and problem choice

The 2025 work by Pollard, Hines and Clayborne is not a worthless “failed experiment”. It is a valuable boundary measurement: their quantum-DFT/VQE workflow produced results for aluminium clusters, but not for the gold case.

What the study attempted

The authors combined a classical DFT environment with an active space intended for solution by a Variational Quantum Eigensolver. VQE adjusts a parameterised trial circuit to minimise its measured energy. It can be attractive for a correlated ground state, but the complete loop requires repeated energy measurements and a stable classical optimiser.

The paper reports electronic results for aluminium clusters up to Al7−. For gold clusters and the intended NO chemistry, the authors identify three obstacles: memory limits, insufficient open-shell support and the absence of relativistic corrections.

Why our route does not require VQE

Question 2025 VQE route Our compact route
Goal Search for a correlated low-energy state. Evolve a known state under a fixed Hamiltonian.
Quantum loop Many energy evaluations plus classical parameter optimisation. State preparation, evolution and measurement; no variational parameters.
Relativity Missing from the reported gold workflow. Spin–orbit coupling is included upstream in QE and the spinor-Wannier Hamiltonian.
Compression Molecular active space. Exact one-hole sector: C(12,11)=12 states, encoded in 4 qubits.

Not a universal victory over VQE

Avoiding VQE does not show that VQE is generally unnecessary. If the research question requires an unknown, strongly correlated ground state, an eigenstate solver returns to the problem. Our simplification comes from solving a different task: controlled real-time dynamics in an exactly known sector.

Claim boundary. This is a methodological comparison, not a like-for-like reproduction. Pollard et al. studied clusters and chemical reactivity; our route is inspired by a bulk solid. We therefore do not claim to have solved their chemistry problem.
Project page: Relativistic gold

  1. Part 1: Why gold is a relativistic quantum problem
  2. Part 2: Why the 2025 gold VQE study stalled
  3. Part 3: From QE and spin–orbit coupling to Qiskit
  4. Part 4: Twelve gold spinor modes on four qubits
  5. Part 5: The 24-qubit route: an active window for transport
  6. Part 6: 24 qubits on IBM and with Fire Opal
  7. Part 7: The road to quantum advantage for gold

Sources and reproducibility

  • Pollard, Hines & Clayborne (2025), Exploring Quantum Computing for Metal Cluster Analysis
  • Pyykkö & Desclaux (1979), relativistic effects in chemistry

Project status: 8 August 2026. Numerical values come from the frozen local research artifacts; the original claim boundaries are deliberately preserved.

Recent Posts

  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 9 augustus 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 8 augustus 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 7 augustus 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 6 augustus 2026
  • Quantum computing-nieuws — 5 augustus 2026

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • May 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • September 2024

Categories

  • 10
  • Quantum Computing
  • Uncategorized
©2026 Edukaizen | Theme by SuperbThemes